āĻļুāĻ•্āĻ°āĻŦাāĻ°, ā§§ā§§ āĻ…āĻ•্āĻŸোāĻŦāĻ°, ā§¨ā§Ļā§§ā§¯

Women as depicted in the plays of William Shakespeare with reference to Othello, King Lear, The Tempest, Measure for Measure and Julius Caesar.


 Page : 1

(Cover Page) 

Department Of English 

Name of Institution :................................................................................

MA (Final) Year


 

TERM PAPER
ON


“Women as depicted in the plays of William Shakespeare with reference to Othello, King Lear, The Tempest, Measure for Measure and Julius Caesar”


Submitted to:
Name of Teacher...........................
Lecturer/Assistant/Associate Professor
Department of English
Name of Institution.........................
 
 
Prepared by:
Name of the Student...................................
Class Roll :...............
Session :.................................
Department of English
Name of institution........................................


Page : 2


Department of English
Govt Edward College, Pabna

Declaration


I hereby declare that the concerned term paper entitled “Women as depicted in the plays of  William Shakespeare with reference to Othello, King Lear, The Tempest, Measure for Measure and Julius Caesar” is a work of  Md. Mehade Hassan Shaon a student of  MA [Final]  Year,  Department of English, Govt Edward College, Pabna. He has completed his term paper under my supervision and submitted for the partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Arts [MA] under National University, Gazipur, Bangladesh.


                                                             
                                                        Abstract

This term paper is an appreciation of Shakespeare’s portrayal of women in his plays. It displays how Shakespeare's written work mirror the treatment of ladies amid the Elizabethan time. In Shakespeare's plays when all is said in done, we can run over a few sorts of female characters. Their impact with different characters and their motivation or part, regularly thought little of like ladies themselves, will be this term paper's principle subject. In William Shakespeare's plays, ladies assume a focal part in propelling the plot. These ladies get to be impetuses for the show that unfurls, particularly in Shakespeare's tragedies, where the responses of alternate characters rely on upon the activities of the ladies. Ladies in Shakespearean plays have dependably had essential parts, in some cases even the main part. Whether they make the principle clashes and base of the plays, or raise intriguing good and social inquiries, they have dependably been placed in testing circumstances. A few ladies are more grounded than others, and their impact on the play is diverse for every one. They regularly even outperform the male legends. Especially in his comedies we much of the time see a lady thought on the most grounded character, while regularly in his tragedies he has a male play the segregated shocking saint. The development of female characters in Shakespeare's plays mirrors the Elizabethan picture of lady when all is said in done. For all that, Shakespeare underpins the English Renaissance generalizations of sexes, their parts and duties in the public eye; he additionally puts their representations into question, challenges, furthermore amends them. Shakespeare, it is asserted by numerous current commentators, was a women's activist. Shapiro for instance goes so far as to claim that Shakespeare seemed to be 'the noblest feminist of all them'. Despite the fact that I am slanted to concur with McLuskie that as Shakespeare 'composed for a male diversion', it is truly mistaken to see him as a women's activist. I trust that Shakespeare due to his exceptional virtuoso for depicting human conduct, fundamentally delineated the state of ladies inside a patriarchal framework and made ladies characters which in their extravagance, rise above the constraints of his time.




Table of Contents



Chapter - I
1.1 Women as depicted in the plays of William Shakespeare.................................................1

Chapter – II
2.1. Shakespeare's representation of women in Othello............................................................

2.2. Shakespeare's representation of women in King Lear.........................................................

2.3. Shakespeare's representation of women in The Tempest...................................................14

2.4. Shakespeare's representation of women in Measure for Measure......................................

2.5. Shakespeare's representation of women in Julius Caesar.....................................................24

                        
       Bibliography........................................................................................................................28
   
      Appendix...............................................................................................................................29


                                                                      
                                                                       Chapter – I

1.1  Women as depicted in the plays of William Shakespeare:
William Shakespeare's (1564-1616) representation of women, and the ways in which his female roles are interpreted and enacted, have become topics of scholarly interest. Shakespeare's heroines encompass a wide range of characterizations and types, from the uncompromising frankness of Cordelia, the quick wit of Beatrice and of Kate, and the intelligence of Portia, to the ruthlessness of Lady Macbeth, the opportunistic unkindness of Regan and Goneril, and the manipulative power of Volumnia. Within this gallery of female characters, critics note similarities, especially among Shakespeare's young women characters, who commonly display great intelligence, vitality, and a strong sense of personal independence. These qualities have led some critics to herald Shakespeare as a champion of womankind and an innovator who departed sharply from flat, stereotyped characterizations of women common to his contemporaries and earlier dramatists. Contrastingly, other commentators note that even Shakespeare's most favorably portrayed women possess characters that are tempered by negative qualities. They suggest that this indicates that Shakespeare was not free of misogynistic tendencies that were deep-seated in the culture of his country and era. Within the texts of the plays, charges of promiscuity are often leveled against young women, for example, and women occupying positions of power are frequently portrayed as capricious and highly corruptible.

Female characters play an important role for the dramatic run of events in Shakespeare’s plays. Just as in reality, women of Shakespeare’s dramas have been bound to rules and conventions of the patriarchal Elizabethan era. Therefore, it was very common back in Elizabethan England to compel woman into marriages in order to receive power, legacy, dowry or land in exchange. Even though the Queen herself was an unmarried woman, the roles of woman in society were extremely restricted. Single women have been the property of their fathers and handed over to their future husbands through marriage.

In Elizabethan time, women were considered as the weaker sex and dangerous, because their sexuality was supposedly mystic and therefore feared by men. Women of that era were supposed to represent virtues like obedience, silence, sexual chastity, piety, humility, constancy, and patience. All these virtues, of course, have their meaning in relationship to men. The role allocation in Elizabethan society was strictly regulated; men were the breadwinners and woman had to be obedient housewives and mothers. However, within this deprived, tight and organized scope, women have been represented in most diverse ways in Shakespearean Drama. Further, summing up, feminism reveals and challenges the cultural shaping of gender roles in all social institutions like family, work, politics, religion, and, of course, in literature and drama. Feminist criticism examines how female experience is portrayed in literature and drama. It tries to expose how, in plays, in novels and other writing, Shakespeare, argued in 1895 that "of Shakespeare's dramatis personae, his women are perhaps the most attractive, and also, in a sense, his most original creations, so different are they, as a patriarchal ideology often stereotypes, distorts, ignores or represses that experience, misrepresenting how women feel, think and act.

In early criticism of female characters in Shakespeare's drama focused on the positive attributes the dramatist bestows on them and often claimed that Shakespeare realistically captured the "essence" of femininity. Helen Zimmern, in the preface to the English translation of Louis Lewes's study The Women of whole, from the ideals of the feminine type prevalent in the literature of his day." According to Irene G. Dash, "Strong, attractive, intelligent, and humane women come to life in Shakespeare's plays. They not only have a clear sense of themselves as individuals, but they challenge accepted patterns for women's behavior. Compliance, self-sacrifice for a male, dependence, nurturance, and emotionalism are the expected norms. Yet independence, self-control and, frequently, defiance characterize these women. In Othello and Romeo and Juliet, women, exercising their independence, defy their fathers as well as the mores of their society. Shakespeare's women characters testify to his genius. They are drawn with neither anger nor condescension. In personality they vary. Some are warm, delightful, friendly; others cold, aloof, and scornful. Some speak with confidence; others with diffidence. But most have a vitality; they grow and develop during the course of a drama. Their actions spring from a realistic confrontation with life as they learn the meaning of self sovereignty for a woman in a patriarchal society."

Chapter – II

2.1.  Shakespeare's representation of women in Othello:
Desdemona is a character in William Shakespeare's play Othello. Shakespeare's Desdemona is a Venetian beauty who  enrages and disappoints her father, a Venetian senator, when she elopes with Othello, a man several years her senior. When her husband is deployed to Cyprus in the service of the Republic of Venice, Desdemona accompanies him. There, her husband is manipulated by his ensign Iago into believing she is an adulteress, and, in the last act, she is murdered by her estranged spouse.

 

In the play's first act, Desdemona has eloped with Othello, a Moor in the service of the Venetian Republic. Before the Duke of Venice, his councilmen, and her father, she proclaims her love for Othello and defends her choice. Her father reluctantly accepts the union, but warns Othello that she will some day deceive him. When Othello is sent to Cyprus in the line of duty, Desdemona accompanies him with his ensign's wife, Emilia attending her.

 

In act 2, Othello's lieutenant, Cassio is disgraced in a brawl, and falls from Othello's favour. Iago suggests to Cassio that he importune Desdemona to intercede for him, which she does. Meanwhile, Iago persuades Othello that Desdemona has formed an illicit relationship with Cassio. However many critics argue that the first seed of doubt is not issued from Iago but by Desdemona’s father "Look to her, Moor, if thou hast eyes to see. She hath deceived her father and may thee." (1.3)

Desdemona is deeply upset by her husband's attacks but continues to assert her love. In the final act, Othello tells her that he knows she has been unfaithful, and is going to kill her. Despite Desdemona's claims of innocence, Othello refuses to believe her, and when he tells her that Cassio has been killed, Desdemona cries out. Othello becomes enraged and suffocates Desdemona, ignoring her pleas for mercy. When her maid Emilia rushes into the room, Desdemona rises weakly to defend Othello, then dies. Eventually, Othello learns of Desdemona's faithfulness after Emilia exposes Iago of his true nature before being stabbed herself to death by Iago, and out of complete remorse, Othello commits suicide, but only after angrily stabbing Iago (though not fatally) as retribution for his lies against Desdemona. Desdemona's cousin Lodovico then orders that Iago be tortured and executed.

In the later tragedy, Othello, it can also be argued that the tragedy occurs from adherence to patriarchal rules and stereotypes. Gayle Greene summarizes this position in her claim that the tragedy of Othello stems from 'men's misunderstandings of women and women's inability to protect themselves from society's conception of them'. Certainly Desdemona's very much feminised qualities of passivity, softness and obedience are no match for Othello's masculine qualities of dominance, aggression and authority. After Othello in his jealousy has struck Desdemona and spoken harshly to her, she tells Iago, 'I am a child to chiding'. Protected by a system which makes women the weaker, dependent sex, Desdemona is unequipped to deal with such aggression; she is helpless against Othello. As Dreher puts it 'following conventional patterns of behavior for wives and daughters, these women lose their autonomy and intimacy and do not achieve adulthood'. Desdemona thus retreats into childlike behavior to escape from reality.

At the close of the play Othello attempts to vindicate himself from intentional murder by claiming that he did nothing 'in malice', but is simply a man 'that loved not wisely but too well'. This speech illustrates the precarious position of love in a society submerged in stereotypes. Othello's excessive, 'unwise' love for Desdemona is tied up with his perception of her as representing perfect womanhood, and his underlying fear of her - endorsed by society - as whore. Like Hamlet, who tells Ophelia 'get thee to a nunnery' in order to protect her chastity and remove his fear of woman's infidelity, Othello too wishes to erase Desdemona's sexuality and potential for infidelity. His decision to kill her, he claims, is to prevent her from a further transgression - 'Yet she must die, else she'll betray more men'.

William Shakespeare's "Othello” can be read from a feminist perspective. A feminist analysis of the play Othello allows us to judge the different social values and status of women in the Elizabethan society. Othello serves as an example to demonstrate the expectations of the Elizabethan patriarchal society, the practice of privileges in patriarchal marriages, and the suppression and restriction of femininity. According to Elizabethan or Shakespeare's society built upon Renaissance beliefs, women were meant only to marry. As their single occupation, marriage held massive responsibilities of house management and child rearing. Additionally, women were expected to be silent, chaste, and obedient to their husbands, fathers, brothers, and all men in general. Patriarchal rule justified women's subordination as the natural order because women were thought to be physiologically and psychologically inferior to men.

As we go through Othello we find that the women characters are presented according to this expectation of the Elizabethan society. There are only three women in Othello’: Desdemona, Emilia and Bianca. The way that these women behave and conduct themselves is undeniably linked to the ideological expectations of Shakespeare’s Elizabethan society and to the patriarchal Venetian society that he creates.

This is not to say, however, that women in Othello do not exhibit any signs of wielding power. Othello, when talking of his wife, often seems pre-occupied with matters of the flesh. Bemoaning the fact that he did not know earlier of his wife’s supposed infidelity, Othello argues that he would have been happier ‘if the general camp,/Pioneers and all, had tasted her sweet body,/So I had nothing known’ (III.3.342-4). He appears to be obsessed with Desdemona’s sexuality. On his way to murder his wife, he states that ‘Thy bed, lust-stained, shall with lust’s blood be spotted’ (V.1.36). The repetition of the word ‘lust’, combined with the sexual associations of Desdemona’s bed and the violent plosives and sibilants of this line, reflects and draws attention to Othello’s preoccupation with sensual matters.

This preoccupation is partly driven by the fact that Desdemona wields so much sexual power over him. Even Cassio refers, jokingly, to Desdemona as ‘our great Captain’s Captain’ (II.1.75), implying that she is the only individual capable of controlling and taming Othello. Desdemona uses this when attempting to persuade Othello to reinstate Cassio: she tells the latter that ‘My lord shall never rest’ (III.3.22) until she has changed his mind, an indication of the tenacity of the woman. Attempting to change his mind, Desdemona is not frightened to use her position and sexuality:

‘Tell me, Othello. I wonder in my soul
What you would ask me that I should deny,
Or stand so mammering on?’ (III.3.68-70)

Later in the play, however, Othello ceases to find Desdemona’s sexual power so entertaining. Speaking to Iago about his planned murder of Desdemona, Othello is adamant that he will ‘not expostulate with her, lest her body and beauty unprovide my mind again’ (IV.1.203-5). As far is Othello is concerned, if he is tempted into conversation and interaction with his wife, then her overpowering sexuality will deter him from the right and inevitable course of action. Her considers her to be a sexual hazard, a strumpet intent on using her body to blind and deceive him. Male society, in addition to constructing women as second-rate citizens, also constructs their sexual allure as evil.



2.2.  Shakespeare's representation of women in King Lear:

Goneril is a character in Shakespeare's tragic play King Lear  (1605). She is the eldest of King Lear's three daughters. Along with her sister Regan, Goneril is considered a villain, obsessed with power and overthrowing her elderly father as ruler of the kingdom of Britain. Her aggressiveness is a rare trait for a female character in Elizabethan literature. Shakespeare based the character on Gonorilla, a personage described by Geoffrey of Monmouth in his pseudohistorical chronicle Historia regum Britanniae ("History of the Kings of Britain", c. 1138) as the eldest of the British king Lear's three daughters, alongside Regan and Cordeilla (the source for Cordelia), and the mother of Marganus.

The earliest example of her deceitful tendencies occurs in the first act. Without a male heir, Lear is prepared to divide his kingdom among his three daughters, as long as they express their true love to him. Knowing her response will get her closer to the throne, Goneril professes, "Sir, I love you more than words can wield the matter" (1.1. 53). She has no reservations about lying to her father. She finally begins to show her true colors when Lear asks to stay with her and her husband. She tells him to send away his knights and servants because they are too loud and too numerous. Livid that he is being disrespected, Lear curses her and leaves.

 

Goneril, the wife of the Duke of Albany (an archaic name for Scotland), has an intimate relationship with Edmund, one that may have been played up in the earlier editions of King Lear. She writes a note encouraging Edmund to kill her husband and marry her, but it is discovered. In the final act, Goneril discovers that Regan has a sexual desire for Edmund as well and poisons her sister’s drink. However, once Edmund is mortally wounded, Goneril goes offstage and kills herself.

King Lear is a play by William Shakespeare. Of course, it was a masterpiece as all of Shakespeare’s work was. This is a text that is commonly assigned for literature and is one that interested me greatly. However, as with all Shakespeare’s writing, I have trouble with the text until I had help. After I managed to understand the plot and figure out the story, I realized that Shakespeare may not have been all that fond of the ladies. King Lear is a prime example of this. I found that King Lear portrays women in a negative light.


The story is about a King, who is ready to retire, who decides to divide his lands equally among his three daughters. Before doing this, he tests his daughters. He asks them how much they love him. Each daughter gives him a different answer, two of which flatter him no end. However, his favorite daughter, Cordelia, gives him an answer he does not understand and this makes him angry. She says she has no words to describe her love for her father. As a result, King Lear gets angry and disowns Cordelia. However, Lear knows he has made a blunder when his other two daughters override his authority. By then it is too late.

Women are portrayed in a negative light through Goneril and Regan, Lear’s two daughters. For example, once the land is given by Lear to his daughters, Goneril betrays him. She does not show any remorse over this and is not upset when her father leaves his homes to wander the heath exposed to the elements. Goneril and Regan, women, are portrayed as disloyal, evil and is the cause of the whole problem. Although Regan is not as bad as Goneril, she is a conniving person and she uses her wiles to get men to do her dirty work. This factor portrays all women as conniving, evil and selfish. The fact that King Lear himself forms a personal dislike and distrust of all women in general because of his daughters’ treatment of him also claims this fact.

Although women are factored as bad in King Lear, in certain parts of the play, men too are given a negative form. For example, Edmund, the illegitimate son of Gloucester, is very similar to Goneril. They are both frustrated by their fathers’ legitimate reasons for various things and this is what drives them to destroy their fathers. In this part of the play, Shakespeare strives to imply that men too can be bad, but not as bad as women. This factor is highlighted by the fact that Edmund is illegitimate and this gives him a bit more sympathy by the readers or audience.

The absence of female authority figures, including mothers, is also a chauvinistic approach to the play. Where did they go? Did they all die? This factor was not clear to me initially, but while reading the text, it struck me as quite odd. This caused me to question on what Shakespeare was trying to say. Was he saying that mothers are necessary to a family or not? Was he trying to say that men are the supreme rulers of the family and, therefore, female figures are unnecessary? Or was he trying to say that a family is bound to fall apart without a proper female figure? Whatever the case may be, Shakespeare made a great impression on the role of women in King Lear.

The female characters in King Lear are powerful figures who are often as aggressive as, and at times more ruthless than, their male counterparts. Cordelia, who is pure, unselfish, and unflinchingly loyal, is a more standard Shakespearean woman than her strong, assertive, conspiratorial, violent, and regal sisters, Goneril and Regan. While the older sisters are clearly very different in personality from the youngest, and while Goneril and Regan are clearly villains, all three daughters resemble their father. In Goneril and Regan, the similarity rests in their pride, arrogance, and fierce temper; in Cordelia, it rests in her aura of royal dignity, courage, and uncompromising stubbornness.

All three sisters help to propel the plot, and Goneril and Regan are even effective killers (Regan, most unusual for a Shakespearean woman, kills with a sword). The presence of these three women becomes even more interesting when we remember that, as often happens in Shakespeare, there are no mothers present in the play; Lear’s and Gloucester’s dead wives are mentioned neither by these men nor by their children. Without guidance from other females, the sisters actively pursue their desires as they themselves see fit.



2.3.  Shakespeare's representation of women in The Tempest:

Miranda is one of the principal characters  of William Shakespeare’s The Tempest. She is the only female character to appear on stage during the course of the play and is one of only three women mentioned. Miranda is the daughter of Prospero, one of the main characters of William Shakespeare's The Tempest. She was banished to the Island along with her father at the age of three, and in the subsequent twelve years has lived with her father and their slave, Caliban, as her only company. She is openly compassionate and unaware of the evils of the world that surrounds her, learning of her father's fate only as the play begins.

 

Miranda is Prospero's daughter. She was 3 years old when she and her father were exiled. Now, some 12 years later, she is beginning to blossom into a beautiful young woman. She is an innocent, having never seen another woman and having no knowledge of any other human being, except for her father. She is unaware of her beauty because she does not know what feminine beauty is suppose to look like.

Miranda's compassion is evident in the first act, with her concern for the passengers caught up in the storm. Miranda is also justifiably indignant at her father's story of betrayal. Her tenderness is also evident when she begs her father not to use magic to control Ferdinand, whom she loves. Miranda is an obedient daughter, as proved by her dismay when she forgets herself and reveals her name to Ferdinand, but she is also a young woman in love, and when her father is occupied, she immediately looks to release Ferdinand from his labors. Miranda has no experience with people, and she has no experience with men, other than her father and Caliban. Because of her isolation, she has developed no artful skills at flirting, and when Ferdinand tells her that he loves her, Miranda weeps. In all that she does, Miranda is sweet and pure, honest and loving.

 

During the encounter Miranda once again stands up to her father, arguing against his harsh treatment of Ferdinand and defending his honor when Prospero refers to him as nothing more than another Caliban. Miranda's next appearance is in the third act. She and Ferdinand take a few moments together to get acquainted and are quickly married. She insists on doing the work that her father has assigned him, and freely admits her naivety to him before swearing her love for him. The scene ends with their marriage, Miranda swearing she will be his servant if Ferdinand will not take her as his wife. Her last appearance is in the play's final scene. After Prospero reveals himself to the assembled crowd he reveals the happy couple engaged in a game of chess. Miranda is teasing Ferdinand for cheating but admits that even if he is dishonest, she's more than happy to believe it for the love she bears for him.

Like all the works of Shakespeare, The Tempest has been studied in great detail. There are books and articles on every imaginable aspect of it and on that of its adaptations. What is remarkable though is that most of these books and articles focus on Prospero and Caliban. Of course, in the light of recent events (decolonization and changing views on racism) and the flourishing field of postcolonial studies it is not strange that most attention goes to these two characters, but it does mean that some of the characters get less attention than they deserve. Although there are of course articles or books on the other characters of The Tempest or characters that are not even visible in the play, e.g. Stephen Orgel's Prospero's Wife, most scholars seem to forget Miranda or are of the opinion that she is not relevant, that she is only an object of exchange in Prospero's schemes to regain his position and get back to the mainland.
.
 
The Tempest is a play by William Shakespeare, probably written in 1610–11, although some researchers have argued for an earlier dating. Its protagonist is the banished sorcerer Prospero, rightful Duke of Milan, who uses his magical powers to punish and forgive his enemies when he raises a tempest that drives them ashore. The entire play takes place on an island under his control whose native inhabitants, Ariel and Caliban, aid (or in the case of Caliban, hinder) his work. While listed as a comedy when it was initially published in the First Folio of 1623, many modern editors have since re-labeled the play as one of Shakespeare's late romances.

The Tempest has only one female character, Miranda. Other women, such as Caliban's mother Sycorax, Miranda's mother and Alonso's daughter Claribel, are only mentioned. Because of the small role women play in the story in comparison to other Shakespeare plays, The Tempest has not attracted much feminist criticism. Miranda is typically viewed as being completely deprived of freedom by her father. Her only duty in his eyes is to remain chaste. Ann Thompson argues that Miranda, in a manner typical of women in a colonial atmosphere, has completely internalised the patriarchal order of things, thinking of herself as subordinate to her father.

The less-prominent women mentioned in the play are subordinated as well, as they are only described through the men of the play. Most of what is said about Sycorax, for example, is said by Prospero. Further, Stephen Orgel notes that Prospero has never met Sycorax—all he learned about her he learned from Ariel. According to Orgel, Prospero's suspicion of women makes him an unreliable source of information. Orgel suggests that he is skeptical of female virtue in general, citing his ambiguous remark about his wife's fidelity.


2.4. Shakespeare's representation of women in Measure for Measure:

Isabella, like the Duke, may be viewed in different ways. She can be seen as a victim, especially a female victim of male lust and manipulation. But she can also be seen as cold and lacking in human feeling – to whom the descriptions applied to Angelo may also be pertinent: ‘a man whose blood  is very snow-broth'; ‘scarce confesses that his blood flows'. Some of the most moving and powerful lines in Shakespeare’s play “Measure for Measure” are spoken by the chaste and virtuous subject of this character analysis, Isabella, who is attempting to save the life of her brother by pleading with Antonio to  reverse the death sentence that has been handed down to him. Isabella is one of the most compelling and most worthy candidates for a character analysis in “Measure for Measure” by William Shakespeare because of her depth and ability to communicate so effectively, thus she is one of the most intriguing of all in “Measure for Measure” for a character analysis.

The most effective speech that Isabella in Shakespeare’s “Measure for Measure” makes occurs after she has exhausted her pleas with the cruel and rigid Antonio and after she has staved off his sexual advances as a bargain for her brother’s release. Isabella meditates on the nature of power and how utterly corrupting and abusive it can be when it is in the hands of an unreasonable tyrant. The speech represents not just Isabella’s thoughts about power, however; it also serves as the key the reader can use to understand who Isabella is, exactly, and how she is developing as a character. In short, this particular section in “Measure for Measure” by Shakespeare broadens out her character and allows the reader to understand her both as an individual and as a character in the larger scheme of the play.

When the reader meets Isabella early on in Shakespeare’s “Measure for Measure”, she is already complex simply as a result of her circumstances and decisions and thus a character analysis of Isabella in “Measure for Measure” by Shakespeare could almost simply focus on the details of her situation. In terms of characterization, she is headstrong in her desire to live a quiet life of contemplation as she is about to enter a cloistered nunnery. Isabella in “Measure for Measure” by Shakespeare is such a devoted Christian that she actually articulates a wish that the convent would be even more stringent in its requirements for an austere contemplative life. When she is approached by Lucio, who appeals to Isabella’s familial loyalty and begs that she approach Antonio and intercede on her brother Claudio’s behalf, Isabella demurs, expressing disbelief that she, a humble servant of God, could make a difference.

Interestingly, in line with one of the major themes from “Measure for Measure” byShakespeare,  it is by exercising this subversive form of power that Isabella exerts her authority. Angelo finds himself strangely moved by Isabella, not emotionally, but sexually. This realization embroils him in psychological conflicts, for this is the very “crime” of which he has accused Claudio. Isabella, through actions and through words, shows how powerful talking the talk and walking the walk can be. Isabella’s speech against absolute and corrupting power demonstrates a mature understanding of what power is and how it can and should be used.

A religious house where nuns ' women who have devoted themselves to the worship of God, and have taken vows of poverty, chastity and obedience ' live and pray (also called a Convent). Disobedience to the known will of God. According to Christian theology human beings have displayed a pre-disposition to sin since the Fall of Humankind. In the Bible the promise, or contract, between a man and a woman committing them to a life together, is also used as an image of the relationship between God and his people.

By Suzanne Coxhill "Measure for Measure" is in some ways a modern play in the issues it deals with. Women's issues are explored throughout the play in many different ways. Sexuality and the independence of women are seen through both the eyes of men and women in this play. Women are portrayed with many strengths and weaknesses in "Measure for Measure". The job roles portrayed in this play as prostitutes, nuns and housewives make our responses to these women alter. Women got married very young and often died in childbirth, thus family life being all they knew. Isabella is seen as a very strong character who is not afraid to voice her own opinions about things. Mistress overdone brings much of the humor to the play with her small role that she plays. She runs a brothel and therefore with Angelo's plans to abolish fornication in Vienna, her career is under threat. Mariana is seen as a more submissive character.

This almost makes Angelo sound jealous of Isabella's innocence and we again feel sympathy towards her as we believe there to be no escaping this evil dilemma she is stuck in. "Better it were a brother died at once that that a sister, by redeeming him should die forever", she seems more concerned with her own salvation than with her brothers life at this point and we lose any sympathy we once had. To save her chastity, Isabella is sacrificing her brother. She is clearly unsure, which is the worse crime to God. At this point of the play, we can see where the attitudes of a 21st century audience and those of a 17th century audience would oppose each other. Today, an audience would find it hard to understand giving up a brother in order to save their virginity. As religion was much more important in everyday life in the 17th century, this audience could probably understand the decision made by Isabella a lot more.

There are only five female characters in Measure for Measure, and they seem to be carefully chosen by Shakespeare to reflect a spectrum of sexual attitudes and behavior:
  • At one extreme is the bawd, Mistress Overdone
  • At the other is Sister Francisca, the nun
  • In what may be called the middle ground, are Juliet and Mariana:
    • Juliet has enjoyed physical love outside marriage and is paying the penalty; she also bears a child, and by the end of the play, she is married
    • Mariana, like Juliet, knows what it is to suffer for love, and by the end of the play she too experiences both sex and marriage.
It is against these other women that the audience is asked to weigh Isabella.

 

             2.5. Shakespeare's representation of women in Julius Caeser: 
 
the play Julius Caesar William Shakespeare only includes two female characters who play relatively minor parts. Shakespeare included these characters because they bring an element of foreshadowing to the tragic events that occur in the play. One example would be in Act II, Scene II when Caesar's wife Calpurnia foreshadows the death of her husband. She tells Caesar, "do not go forth today: call i my fear," (Act II, Scene II). In that line Calpurnia is telling Caesar not to go to the capitol that day because sh feels that something bad is going to happen to him. As we know, something bad does happen. Another example of the female characters foreshadowing tragic events would have to be Calpurnia's dream in Act II, Scene II. "She dremt tonight she saw my statue which like a fountain with a n hundred spouts did run pure blood; and many lusty Romans come smiling and did bathe their hands in it," (Act II, Scene II). This is foreshadowing the death of Caesar in the next act. This also foreshadows when the conspirators bathe their hands in Caesar's blood after they kill him.

Another example would be the character of Portia, Brutus's wife. In Act II, Scene IV Portia attempts to see if Caesar is at the capitol and she sends Lucius to the capitol to make sure everything is fine. She tells him, "I heard a bustling rumor, like a fray, And the wind brings from the capitol," (Act II, Scene IV). She is telling Lucius that she heard a loud noise coming from the capitol that almost sounded like a riot. This foreshadows the riot that is going to break out after the Romans find out about Caesar's death. Even though the women in Julius Caesar have minor roles in the play. They are the main characters that bring out the element of foreshadowing to the story.

In the play “Julius Caesar” by William Shakespeare, women play an important role. The women are important factors in foreshadowing and in the development of many of the characters. To look at the role of women in the play we must look deeper in to the roles of the only two women in the play; Calpurnia, wife of Caesar, and Portia, wife of Brutus. Both of these women are key in foreshadowing the murder of Caesar. After Caesar’s murder we do not hear much of either of them. Caesar says that cowards die many times before their death and death will come when it will come. Then Caesar asked a servant what the augurers say about the subject and they say they found no heart within the beast.    


The significance of the roles of women in the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare can be prodded from the two female characters namely, Calpurnia and Portia, who are instrumental in the world of men they have to live in. Despite the seemingly minor parts that these women have, their presence in the play should be regarded as important as they both bring a trace of foreshadowing to intensify the calamities of the events which will occur subsequently as well as a more lucid view of the personas of their husbands in their private lives.  

In Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, it is a man’s world.  In the Roman world, women were irrelevant.  They were not allowed to speak in public and were barred from the world of politics. A woman’s main function was to serve in the home.  Women in the Shakespearean plays were used to oppose the values of a masculine world. There are only two female characters in Julius Caesar. Calpurnia and Portia love and serve their husbands. 

Firstly, the role of Calpurnia as Caesar’s loving wife is paramount in her belief in superstitions that she actually has forewarned Caesar from his tragic death. After her terrifying dream in which she saw Caesar’s statue pouring blood in a fountain while others washed their hands in it, she urges  her husband to cancel his outing resolutely to which it falls to deaf ears. Her dream in Act II, Scene II states that she "saw my statue which like a fountain with an hundred spouts did run pure blood; and many lusty Romans come smiling and did bathe their hands in it," and this poses as a foreshadowing to the death of Caesar by the Senate in the next act when conspirators of his murder bathe their hands in his blood. However, Caesar easily dismisses his wife’s concerns as trivialities and makes up his own interpretation of the dream that he fails to avoid his barbaric death. Thus, Calpurnia, as a wife, has shown her devotion by standing by her husband’s decision to venture through the night amidst her perturbed mind but her role as a woman puts her in a disadvantage that she has to lose her husband.

Julius Caesar’s wife was Calpurnia.   A wife’s role is as worrier about the safety of her husband.  Calpurnia exclaims: “You shall not stir out of your house today.” Her purpose in the play was to foreshadow the death of Caesar at the senate.  On the eve of the Ides of March, Calpurnia has a portentous dream.  Calpurnia imagines herself to be “A lioness [that] hath whelped in the streets.”   In comparison, Caesar has asserted that he does not fear death end

Next, there is Portia who is Brutus’s wife in the play. Her role as a woman bears a more influential effect on her husband. She does not want to merely become a wife but also the confidante of Brutus that she compels him to tell her all his deeds, for she believes she can be a good supporter and motivator to him. Upon witnessing the distraught mind of her husband, she wills him to share his troubles so that she can assist him as his wife. Here, Portia resembles a woman of poise and strong character who realizes that she lives among men that she wants to have an active role in men’s businesses. The extent of her love to Brutus and thus, her wish to help him settle his problems is evident when she hurts herself in the thigh with a dagger to prove her readiness to sustain whatever pains which might come with the secret predicament.  This is her way of giving absolute and undeniable support to Brutus's ventures. Moreover, she also serves as a deliverer of foreshadowing in the play as seen in Act II, Scene IV where Portia attempts to see if Caesar is at the capitol. So, she sends Lucius, her servant, to the capitol to ensure that nothing has gone wrong by telling him, "I heard a bustling rumor, like a fray, And the wind brings from the capitol.” Indeed, what she heard as a raucous from the capital will eventually become the riot after the Romans learn about Caesar’s death. 

The depiction of these two women in the play serves dual purposes, as foils to their husbands, especially in personal matters and as bearers of foreshadowing  for it is a pivotal element in the story development of Julius Caesar. For these reasons, the female characters’ inclusion in the play should not be underestimated in the male-dominated world the story is set. Portia is Brutus's devoted wife.  Portia is aware that something has been troubling Brutus.

Unfortunately, Portia has been convinced that her sex is weaker than men. Intelligent and clever, she is the daughter of the great Cato, a highly reputed Senator; furthermore,  she  believes that she is stronger than most women.  Foolishly, she stabs herself in the thigh showing no pain and demands that Brutus respect her and share his thoughts with her.  Shocked by his wife’s display, he does agree to talk with her later and tell her his problems.  Although Portia is an admirable wife, Shakespeare uses her character to portray some qualities that most Shakespearean men found annoying. She nags her husband; she attempts to manipulate him with the reminder of her ancestry; and she deigns to interfere with her husband’s inner most thoughts. 

Portia has hinted at a future occurrence with her self-inflicted wound.  Later, in Act IV, Brutus shares that Portia has killed herself by swallowing fire or hot coals.  What a horrible death, yet an interesting turn of events since it is the men who are prone to violence. Both women love and respect their husbands.  Yet, their opinions are ignored because they represent the feminine sex. To Shakespeare, they should take care of their domestic roles and let the men rule the world.



Bibliography

(2) Dusinberre, Juliet (1996). Shakespeare and the nature of women. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-312-15973-3.




Appendix

"Strong, attractive, intelligent, and humane women come to life in Shakespeare's plays. They not only have a clear sense of themselves as individuals, but they challenge accepted patterns for women's behavior. Compliance, self-sacrifice for a male, dependence, nurturance, and emotionalism are the expected norms. Yet independence, self-control and, frequently, defiance characterize these women. In Othello and Romeo and Juliet, women, exercising their independence, defy their fathers as well as the mores of their society. Shakespeare's women characters testify to his genius. They are drawn with neither anger nor condescension. In personality they vary. Some are warm, delightful, friendly; others cold, aloof, and scornful. Some speak with confidence; others with diffidence. But most have a vitality; they grow and develop during the course of a drama. Their actions spring from a realistic confrontation with life as they learn the meaning of self sovereignty for a woman in a patriarchal society." - Irene G. Dash. (Introduction: Their Infinite Variety, in Wooing, Wedding, and Power: Women in Shakespeare's Plays, Columbia University Press, 1981, pp. 1-2)












āĻĒ্āĻ°িā§Ÿ āĻ—াāĻ¨েāĻ° āĻ¸ংāĻ•্āĻˇিāĻĒ্āĻ¤ āĻ¤াāĻ˛িāĻ•া...

**āĻĒ্āĻ°িā§Ÿ āĻ—াāĻ¨েāĻ° āĻ¸ংāĻ•্āĻˇিāĻĒ্āĻ¤ āĻ¤াāĻ˛িāĻ•া... ā§§) āĻŽāĻ¨ āĻļুāĻ§ু āĻŽāĻŽ āĻ›ুঁā§ŸেāĻ›ে- āĻ¸োāĻ˛āĻ¸ ā§¨)āĻ¨িঃāĻ¸্āĻŦ āĻ•āĻ°েāĻ› āĻ†āĻŽাā§Ÿ - āĻļাāĻĢিāĻ¨ ā§Š)āĻĢিāĻ°িā§Ÿে āĻĻাāĻ“- āĻŽাāĻ‡āĻ˛āĻ¸ ā§Ē)āĻļ্āĻ°াāĻŦāĻ¨েāĻ° āĻŽেāĻ˜āĻ—ু...